Monthly Archives: July 2009

‘Fleet Street’ loses last international newsroom

Just as Wall Street is synonymous with banking and the stock market in the United States, Fleet Street symbolizes the British newspaper industry. But tomorrow, the street will lose the last of its international newsrooms, that of Agence France-Presse, as the agency follows the diaspora of other news organizations and moves its journalism headquarters to a less expensive, more technologically capable newsroom.

With the French agency goes the essence of traditional journalism, said the former editor of the Daily Mirror, according to AFP:

Fleet Street represents the past in every way: the way we produce newspapers and the way we produce journalism…Clattering typewriters, hot metal, the smell of ink, the thunder of the lorries delivering the rolls of newsprint and the more-or-less 24-hour drinking.

And though these organizations are yet to pull the plug on their print editions, it’s only a matter of time before the Internets crisscrossing cyberspace in invisible webs all around us become the new metonym.

NY Times to charge for web content

Sources close to the paper have confirmed to The DC Writup they plan to charge readers for online content starting as early as the end of the summer. According to the article, the Times would be the first non-financial newspaper to charge for online access. The Times is toying with three ideas for online browsing — charge a flat monthly fee, charge customers on an article-by article basis, charge different amounts for different readership packages — in an attempt to compensate for drastically decreased print and online ad revenue.

In theory, this is a good idea. But when online viewers can still get news for free on other Web sites, they risk alienating both casual and loyal readers. Although maybe the move will shift readers back to print, since newspapers are at least tangible proof of monetary expenditures.

Many at odds with AP’s plan to limit fair use

On Thursday, the Associated Press said they plan to require licensing agreements before any Web site can link to a news organizations’ articles. Their proposal questions how news should be shared on the Internet and challenges fair use policies. And it seems many news organizations and journalists are against the AP’s proposition.

Ken Richieri, The New York Times Co.’s general counsel, told Doug Lichtman, a UCLA professor, that he thought fair use protections works “a lot better in the analog world than they do in the digital world.” He also said that online news aggregators do not necessarily constitute a copyright issue, as the AP has declared, though they do foster unfair competition.

Further, an article on Huffington Post argues that the AP’s licensing requirements would destroy not only the Internet, but the AP itself:

That would kill the Internet. It also would kill the Associated Press and the news organizations it cons into joining its dangerous crusade — make that its cartel — for no one will link to them and they will not be heard.

And here’s another problem: Jane Seagrave, senior vice president of global product development at AP told the Washington Post that the AP will use software that will enable them to determine what is being read on individual computers, a disturbingly Big-Brotherish method for tracking links.

This could ultimately lead to the extinction of the AP, said John Palfrey, a law professor and co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard:

If people think that there’s a greater likelihood that on an AP story, people could track down what they are reading, they are less likely to make the choice of that particular story rather than another story.

El Paso Times may be next casualty

The El Paso Times, the city’s oldest daily newspaper, announced tonight they are holding a ‘frank conversation’ about their future tomorrow morning. The publisher and editor of the paper, along with the entire El Paso Press Club, will discuss the paper’s ‘projects and other journalism-related topics.’ Sounds ominous. At least they’re inviting all members of the media to the meeting, though most reporters in the city will probably already be sitting on the panel.

But the number of unemployed, freelancing reporters available to attend future ‘conversations’ in El Paso should increase once the Times announces they are folding.

Why newspapers are still necessary

Yesterday, Ann Arbor News printed its last edition, following the unsettling trend spearheaded by such established papers as Denver’s Rocky Mountain News, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and the Christian Science Monitor. Maybe we don’t need newspapers to get our news, but I don’t want to swat flies with a MacBook. Other things you can’t do with a computer, but can with a newspaper:
•Paper-Mache a pinata.
•Create a megaphone for important announcements.
•Wrap gifts.
•Doodle squiggly lines on the front page while talking on the phone.
•Make a pirate hat.
Threaten Blue Dog democrats into voting for health care reform.
Wrap fish for cooking. Apparently, it cooks nicely and dinner guests can open their own package of food. Elegant.
•Assemble a ransom note.
•Kindle a fire. Kindles probably aren’t as useful. And they censor themselves.
•Make paper airplanes.
•Line a birdcage.
•Read it on Sundays without worrying about getting bagel crumbs in its keyboard.
•Find a masthead without keyword searching.
•Tear it up in frustration after another headline announces another newspaper has printed its last words.

How to get a story on the front page: a reporter’s revelation

With news and headlines flickering instantaneously onto homepages before vanishing mysteriously, the front page has become a venerable forum for the best stories and the most compelling articles.

But getting a story on the front page of a newspaper is often a lesson in politics, a New York Times media reporter told me last week.

There are, of course, the leading national and international news stories — health care, New Jersey corruption rings, the moral collapse of the Republican Party — but there are also stories that could appear in any other section.

A story about an orchestra from Newark High School, a story ultimately about hope and class and limits. A story about New York’s plan to shut down part of Times Square so pedestrians can relax in plastic lawn chairs beneath neon advertisements and exhaust. A story about the economy’s toll on flower exhibitions.

These are the stories that may get an editor’s nod for reasons hidden from its readers, he said.

“Sometimes,” he said, “An article may get on the front page because the writer is due for a front page story.” And sometimes, reporters lobby their editors for a front page spot, e-mailing and corresponding to gain a favorable position. After all, he said, journalists want people to read their stories, especially stories that do not sensationalize or bear obvious magnitude, but are more personally compelling. It’s a political process, a cut-throat campaign where reporters seek approval for their written word. A lot of reporters don’t fight for a front page spot, but he does. Because he still believes in print, even as a new media reporter who ironically got his job at the Times because he started a highly successful media blog.

Often, he said, reporters fail no matter how persistent they are, their articles relegated to the front page of the business or the arts section. Inside the paper, out of sight, out of mind for people used to reading transient headlines online.

But sometimes, journalists do succeed in convincing their section editors that their story is front page material, pulling enough sway that their editors pitch the story to their own editors. Support snowballs, and the next morning, the article is one of the six most visible. And the front page, unlike the homepage, lasts all day. A front page byline today is as close to permanent as you get.

AnnArbor.com launches

AnnArbor.com, the Web site taking the place of the now defunct Ann Arbor News, which printed its last edition yesterday, launched today. In addition to ‘dozens of blogs,’ the site will also offer a print version on Thursdays and Sundays for $9 per month. But the newspaper won’t have blogs.  Or readers, since the articles in the paper will be outdated by the time the paper is delivered.

Washington Post: ‘Don’t be fooled’

An article posted online today on the Washington Post site provides a grim perspective on the profits that four major newspaper publishers recorded for their second quarters:

It’s pretty likely that this “return to profitability” is only temporary, as more drastic changes are sure to come. Even if the economy turns around, think of the past week’s earnings as a small break from the pain the newspaper industry is going through.

The article also says this:

Having cut editorial and sales staffs significantly, it’s worth wondering whether newspapers will be able to maintain their brands, since competition from the web shows no sign of abating.

The Post offered no solutions for saving the newspaper industry, though it does say the industry’s survival is ‘the new profitability.’ But will people read a printed version of a depressed death rattle? Will advertisers invest in a staggering industry that threatens to bite the dust at any moment?

The robustness of web journalism makes the newspaper industry look geriatric, especially when emphasis is on survival rather than prosperity. But maybe it’s too late. Maybe these second-quarter profits are a smokescreen as publishers resign themselves to their own mortality, as they pick up their canes and hobble out the door.

AP challenges fair use on the web

The Associated Press is testing the limits of fair use on the Internet by requiring licensing agreements before articles can show up in search engines and on Web sites. The agreement would apply to any ‘cited references that include a headline and a link to an article,’ the AP’s president and chief executive told The New York Times today.

With the industry struggling to stay afloat, this agreement would enable news organizations to gain a profit when search engines such as Google or Yahoo cite their articles:

News organizations already have the ability to prevent their work from turning up in search engines — but doing so would shrink their Web audience, and with it, their advertising revenues. What The A.P. seeks is not that articles should appear less often in search results, but that such use would become a new source of revenue.

But this agreement could lead to lower journalistic standards as news aggregators rush to produce their own articles to avoid paying for ledes. Or maybe all those reporters who are being laid off from newspapers can find new jobs in replication?

Did early newspaper-to-web technology jeapordize print?

In a post today on Poynter, a blogger comments on an article by Robert Niles in last week’s Online Journalism Review about early newspaper-to-print technology. Niles argues that the cumbersome early technology used to publish stories online made news managers complacent. They thought the inherent difficulty was widespread, that everyone would encounter the same slow, awkward process in posting stories online. If real articles published by real journalists appeared online only after a labored, time-intensive method of uploading, certainly no one else could challenge their efforts in disseminating news. Niles says this was a fatal mistake, allowing managers to ignore the expanding blogosphere and do nothing innovative themselves:

What if more managers had paid attention to the ease with which so many of us were cranking out our personal websites and charged us, on company time, to develop tools to allow all newspaper readers to do the same? Can you image what could have happened had newspapers developed and controlled the first blogging tools?
…By the time that online jockeys who didn’t have to struggle getting newspaper copy online had developed tools like Craigslist, Blogger and AdWords, the competition they unleashed overwhelmed the industry before newspaper managers could change their thinking.

Now, everyone is a journalist, chronicling news through their experience and posting stories without following standard journalistic procedures like copy editing and second reads. But early web journalism was less streamlined. And perhaps the casual attitude, the belief that professional journalists were the only experts on distributing news, will actually save print. Because when things are too easy, when too many people are posting similar stories and everyone is weighing in, maybe the simple newspaper, with easy-to-read fonts and ordered columns, will offer some relief from the constant flood of commentary from people who may burn out from sheer journalistic exhaustion.

New York Times Co. latest to post second-quarter profit

The New York Times Company followed the latest trend in the newspaper company industry, as drastic cost-cutting led to a second-quarter profit despite decreased ad revenue. Profits are good, but with staff layoffs (and unhappy journalists without benefits and vacations), quality articles could disappear even before print. Maybe send some reporters to exotic locations for a travel story?

Ann Arbor News prints last words

Ann Arbor News is the latest victim of the newspaper industry’s decline, as they announced they are printing their last edition today. It will go online as AnnArbor.com, which will have a print addition twice a week.
In a farewell piece , posted, ironically, online, reporter and columnist Geoff Larcom wrote:

We did it for the connection to each other. There is no more interactive place than a newsroom. It is made for vivid conversations, freshened by the ever-changing nature of events and issues we cover.

And then:

As it was then, so it is now, as Web sites, blogs, Facebook and Twitter take center stage on Ann Arbor’s rapidly evolving media scene.

I don’t know, Twitter and blogs may be more immediate, but there is something magical about writing on deadline in a newsroom.

New York Times ‘live blogging’ is lead article on homepage

After President Obama’s prime time press conference about his health care reforms, the New York Times homepage featured a live blog of Obama’s remarks. Almost an hour since his last words, and blogging is the new analysis. Hopefully, tomorrow’s front page will have an article without timestamps.

Communist paper will go online only

People’s Weekly World newspaper, the United States Communist Party’s paper, will stop its print edition starting January 2010. Though the editor said they may offer a daily version of the paper that can be downloaded, there isn’t quite the same social effect in reading a manifesto on a MacBook Pro.

Are online journalism ethics different?

In a piece on Huffington Post today, Tim Berry, president and founder of Palo Alto Software, challenges TechCrunch’s decision to publish documents stolen from Twitter. He says this violates journalism ethics. He argues that TechCrunch is not doing a public service, as Daniel Ellsberg did when he published the Pentagon Papers in the New York Times. Armed with this confidential information, Berry writes, TechCrunch decided to publicly reveal a company’s secrets:

Not because the world needs it, not to defend anybody against anything, just for the fun of it. There’s no public good involved, not that I can see.

Berry argues there should still be a ‘code of conduct’ in the blogosphere, just as there is in print journalism, that blogs should not maliciously publish posts just because they can. But who decides which classified documents are beneficial to the public? Do bloggers have to adhere to the Code of Ethics of the Professional Society of Journalists when anyone can blog? Time for some debate. There’s probably a blog for that.